2 Comments:
- At 12:31 AM, dannoynted1 said...
-
jealous as usual!
just to see if you are not then you will leave this post on but i bet you five bucks you take it off like you did plenty of times before. - At 12:46 AM, Jaime Kenedeño said...
-
You know Watt?
At least Mikal can stand up and be accountable for WATT he did.
At least he dont use our children and create a crisis using them to get elected.
And now he is doing WATT I have said from the beginning if he wants to influence government to run himself.
He is from here from Corpus Christi. We can pick on him, but when outsiders like the Chismosos try to come in and hijack our Democratic party I will fight that tooth and nail. It just so happens Mikal is on my side this time. That is the luck of the draw.
Another thing he is not so hypocritical as to uphold the 1st amendment with lip service while censoring his critics in the media like this discredited website.
No offense to could be true. I think you are a fair minded human being.
Dont bother deleting my post it will be placed in several other venues.
Noriega cannot beat Junior John and Mikal can.
I am about dethroning Junior John.
here is a little bit of homework:
Junior John on the issues
· Competition would help improve our public schools. (Jun 2002)
Competition would help improve our public schools
The public school system is the bedrock of K-12 education. Competition would help improve our public schools. Local control of schools should remain paramount. His priority is to see to the implementation of the Administration law stressing increased accountability, improved teacher quality, more parental involvement and a renewed focus on reading.
Source: Campaign website, www.JohnCornyn.com, "Issues" Jun 20, 2002
· Voted NO on $52M for "21st century community learning centers". (Oct 2005)
Voted NO on $52M for "21st century community learning centers".
To increase appropriations for after-school programs through 21st century community learning centers. Voting YES would increase funding by $51.9 million for after school programs run by the 21st century community learning centers and would decrease funding by $51.9 million for salaries and expenses in the Department of Labor.
Reference: Amendment to Agencies Appropriations Act; Bill S Amdt 2287 to HR 3010 ; vote number 2005-279 on Oct 27, 2005
· Voted NO on $5B for grants to local educational agencies. (Oct 2005)
Voted NO on $5B for grants to local educational agencies.
To provide an additional $5 billion for title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Voting YES would provide:
· $2.5 billion for targeting grants to local educational agencies
· $2.5 billion for education finance incentive grants
Reference: Elementary and Secondary Education Amendment; Bill S Amdt 2275 to HR 3010 ; vote number 2005-269 on Oct 26, 2005
· Voted NO on shifting $11B from corporate tax loopholes to education. (Mar 2005)
Voted NO on shifting $11B from corporate tax loopholes to education.
Vote to adopt an amendment to the Senate's 2006 Fiscal Year Budget Resolution that would adjust education funding while still reducing the deficit by $5.4 billion. A YES vote would:
· Restore education program cuts slated for vocational education, adult education, GEAR UP, and TRIO.
· Increase the maximum Pell Grant scholarship to $4,500 immediately.
· Increases future math and science teacher student loan forgiveness to $23,000.
· Pay for the education funding by closing $10.8 billion in corporate tax loopholes.
Reference: Kennedy amendment relative to education funding; Bill S AMDT 177 to S Con Res 18 ; vote number 2005-68 on Mar 17, 2005
· Rated 27% by the NEA, indicating anti-public education votes. (Dec 2003)
Rated 27% by the NEA, indicating anti-public education votes.
Cornyn scores 27% by the NEA on public education issues
The National Education Association has a long, proud history as the nation's leading organization committed to advancing the cause of public education. Founded in 1857 "to elevate the character and advance the interests of the profession of teaching and to promote the cause of popular education in the United States," the NEA has remained constant in its commitment to its original mission as evidenced by the current mission statement:
To fulfill the promise of a democratic society, the National Education Association shall promote the cause of quality public education and advance the profession of education; expand the rights and further the interest of educational employees; and advocate human, civil, and economic rights for all.
In pursuing its mission, the NEA has determined that it will focus the energy and resources of its 2.7 million members toward the "promotion of public confidence in public education." The ratings are based on the votes the organization considered most important; the numbers reflect the percentage of time the representative voted the organization's preferred position.
Oh yes, thank you for promoting my good name. Maybe I should be so swell and return the favor?










