Keep sound wisdom and discretion, and they will be life for your soul and adornment for your neck…………….. Then you will walk on your way securely, and your foot will not stumble…………... If you lie down, you will not be afraid; when you lie down, your sleep will be sweet…………Do not be afraid of sudden terror or of the ruin of the wicked, when it comes,for the Lord will be your confidence and will keep your foot from being caught. Do not withhold good from those to whom it is due, when it is in your power to do it……..Do not say to your neighbor, “Go, and come again, tomorrow I will give it”—when you have it with you………..Do not plan evil against your neighbor, who dwells trustingly beside you……..Do not contend with a man for no reason, when he has done you no harm.

Thursday, July 12, 2007

By the way, the Anton Haley who's such a Watts cheerleader on DU is better known here as Jaime Kenedeno, noted Communist hunter and Watts hater.

By the way, the Anton Haley who's such a Watts cheerleader on DU is better known here as Jaime Kenedeno, noted Communist hunter and Watts hater.

2 Comments:

At 12:31 AM, dannoynted1 said...

jealous as usual!

just to see if you are not then you will leave this post on but i bet you five bucks you take it off like you did plenty of times before.

At 12:46 AM, Jaime Kenedeño said...

You know Watt?

At least Mikal can stand up and be accountable for WATT he did.

At least he dont use our children and create a crisis using them to get elected.

And now he is doing WATT I have said from the beginning if he wants to influence government to run himself.

He is from here from Corpus Christi. We can pick on him, but when outsiders like the Chismosos try to come in and hijack our Democratic party I will fight that tooth and nail. It just so happens Mikal is on my side this time. That is the luck of the draw.

Another thing he is not so hypocritical as to uphold the 1st amendment with lip service while censoring his critics in the media like this discredited website.

No offense to could be true. I think you are a fair minded human being.

Dont bother deleting my post it will be placed in several other venues.

Noriega cannot beat Junior John and Mikal can.

I am about dethroning Junior John.

here is a little bit of homework:

Junior John on the issues

· Competition would help improve our public schools. (Jun 2002)
Competition would help improve our public schools
The public school system is the bedrock of K-12 education. Competition would help improve our public schools. Local control of schools should remain paramount. His priority is to see to the implementation of the Administration law stressing increased accountability, improved teacher quality, more parental involvement and a renewed focus on reading.
Source: Campaign website, www.JohnCornyn.com, "Issues" Jun 20, 2002


· Voted NO on $52M for "21st century community learning centers". (Oct 2005)
Voted NO on $52M for "21st century community learning centers".
To increase appropriations for after-school programs through 21st century community learning centers. Voting YES would increase funding by $51.9 million for after school programs run by the 21st century community learning centers and would decrease funding by $51.9 million for salaries and expenses in the Department of Labor.
Reference: Amendment to Agencies Appropriations Act; Bill S Amdt 2287 to HR 3010 ; vote number 2005-279 on Oct 27, 2005


· Voted NO on $5B for grants to local educational agencies. (Oct 2005)
Voted NO on $5B for grants to local educational agencies.
To provide an additional $5 billion for title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Voting YES would provide:
· $2.5 billion for targeting grants to local educational agencies
· $2.5 billion for education finance incentive grants
Reference: Elementary and Secondary Education Amendment; Bill S Amdt 2275 to HR 3010 ; vote number 2005-269 on Oct 26, 2005


· Voted NO on shifting $11B from corporate tax loopholes to education. (Mar 2005)
Voted NO on shifting $11B from corporate tax loopholes to education.
Vote to adopt an amendment to the Senate's 2006 Fiscal Year Budget Resolution that would adjust education funding while still reducing the deficit by $5.4 billion. A YES vote would:
· Restore education program cuts slated for vocational education, adult education, GEAR UP, and TRIO.
· Increase the maximum Pell Grant scholarship to $4,500 immediately.
· Increases future math and science teacher student loan forgiveness to $23,000.
· Pay for the education funding by closing $10.8 billion in corporate tax loopholes.
Reference: Kennedy amendment relative to education funding; Bill S AMDT 177 to S Con Res 18 ; vote number 2005-68 on Mar 17, 2005


· Rated 27% by the NEA, indicating anti-public education votes. (Dec 2003)
Rated 27% by the NEA, indicating anti-public education votes.
Cornyn scores 27% by the NEA on public education issues
The National Education Association has a long, proud history as the nation's leading organization committed to advancing the cause of public education. Founded in 1857 "to elevate the character and advance the interests of the profession of teaching and to promote the cause of popular education in the United States," the NEA has remained constant in its commitment to its original mission as evidenced by the current mission statement:
To fulfill the promise of a democratic society, the National Education Association shall promote the cause of quality public education and advance the profession of education; expand the rights and further the interest of educational employees; and advocate human, civil, and economic rights for all.
In pursuing its mission, the NEA has determined that it will focus the energy and resources of its 2.7 million members toward the "promotion of public confidence in public education." The ratings are based on the votes the organization considered most important; the numbers reflect the percentage of time the representative voted the organization's preferred position.


Oh yes, thank you for promoting my good name. Maybe I should be so swell and return the favor?

19 comments:

Jaime Kenedeño said...

South Texas Verdad: By the way, the Anton Haley who's such a Watts cheerleader on DU is better known here as Jaime Kenedeno, noted Communist hunter and Watts hater.

You know those Judges have turned out to be a breath of fresh air.

I have grown to like John Martinez and Bobby Galvan even though I would truly like to see Angelica Hernandez as a District Judge.

i also would like to see Michelle Kuchta sitting in our Judiciary.

Also, I understand that Juan Garcia will be endorsing Mikal as well.

Jaime Kenedeño said...

CorpusChristiCouncilWatch said...

Thanks for the link to the Democratic Underground discussion about Watts' and Noriega's campaign contribution histories.

There was A LOT of information in that discussion that I didn't know about Watts and Noriega.

Why is it that the discussions at Democratic Underground so often make me LESS interested in voting for the Democratic candidates?

12:55 AM
Jaime Kenedeño said...

South Texas Verdad: By the way, the Anton Haley who's such a Watts cheerleader on DU is better known here as Jaime Kenedeno, noted Communist hunter and Watts hater.

You know those Judges have turned out to be a breath of fresh air.

I have grown to like John Martinez and Bobby Galvan even though I would truly like to see Angelica Hernandez as a District Judge.

i also would like to see Michelle Kuchta sitting in our Judiciary.

Also, I understand that Juan Garcia will be endorsing Mikal as well.

1:04 AM
Delete
Jaime Kenedeño said...

WOW, finally got a few comments.

I remember when we could set this place on fire. Yeah, those were the good ole days.

1:11 AM

Jaime Kenedeño said...

Cornyn attacks Watts

Filed by Charles Kuffner on July 12th, 2007

According to today’s Chronicle, Sen. Cornyn continues to be all freaked out by big bad rich guys.

U.S. Sen. John Cornyn’s political money-raising operation has wasted no time in playing the trial lawyer card against potential Democratic opponent Mikal Watts, an attorney from San Antonio.

Cornyn has scheduled a series of fundraisers for the weekend of July 20, featuring presidential adviser Karl Rove as the main attraction. But an invitation letter for the Harlingen event also plays off Republican reactions to trial lawyers.

“We will also have the opportunity to help the senator begin preparing for what appears to be a wealthy, self-financed personal injury lawyer opponent,” said a Cornyn campaign committee letter signed by James G. Springfield, CEO of Valley Baptist Health System in Harlingen.

A Cornyn fundraising letter sent out last month by John Nau of Houston noted: “Unfortunately, John appears to have drawn a very wealthy personal injury lawyer Mikal Watts as a potential opponent.” Cornyn’s aides declined to discuss the specifics of his letters.

I’m not sure if this means Cornyn fears Mikal Watts more than he fears Rick Noriega, if it means he thinks he’s more likely to face Watts than Noriega next year, or if he just thinks Watts is an easier target. Certainly, “trial lawyer” is a nice, comforting piece of shorthand that a Republican in need of a boogeyman can use to whip up the faithful. It does make one wonder what he’ll do if he doesn’t get Watts as his ballotmate, though. Maybe he needs a little more time to think about it.

Here’s a question to ponder: Who do you think would poll worse nowadays, trial lawyers or Karl Rove? Let’s just say that I hope Cornyn and Rove remain BFFs throughout the campaign.

Cornyn’s trip with Rove might seem surprising because the senator recently began distancing himself from the president on the issue of immigration. But from his 2002 election until recently, Cornyn has been a staunch Bush supporter.

Rove helped Cornyn win election to the Texas Supreme Court in 1996, recruited Cornyn to run for state attorney general in 1998 and again to run for the U.S. Senate in 2002.

That in a nutshell is why I believe the 2008 Senate race will be different from the recent ones that preceded it. Cornyn and Bush are two peas in a pod, no matter how pathetically our junior Senator tries to “distance” himself these days. And Bush hasn’t been popular in Texas in a long time. He’s less popular than Cornyn himself, which won’t help. All Cornyn had to do in 2002 was be Bush’s buddy, which was something he could easily do better than Ron Kirk. Now he’s got to run as his own man, but with all that Bush baggage attached to him. It won’t be easy for him. BOR, Eye on Williamson, and Stace have more.

Good JOB. Lets bring Junior John out get him to open his mouth so we can put his foot in it. I seen where Rove will also be in S A at a carpet bagger fund raiser as well.

I guess Mr Rove wants to revisit the La Parra Hunting leases and the Armstrong Ranch inconsistencies. Is Junior John worth it Karl?

We got the Funeral gate and the Delay brothers CCA prison lobby but then that will lead us to the mixture of carpet baggers and Good Democrats in the ship building business.

Comment by Jaime Kenedeno — July 13, 2007 @ 12:27 am

nuts101 said...

Congrats on you new blog. I think.
will recommend it to other people. Just hope it does not turn into STX Chisme.But if it does and is the flip coin of that it will go the way of that blog.No one reads it and no one comments.

Jaime Kenedeño said...

At 10:00 AM, YaGottaLoveIt said...

dannoynted1,

Please send the $5 to Rick Noriega for U.S. Senate campaign, http://www.ricknoriea.com.

At 10:15 AM, YaGottaLoveIt said...

Jaime,

You've had plenty of stuff posted here. The only time you got censored is when you insisted on publishing lying homophobic smears, one about a candidate Watts was supporting for reelection. You later met one of the people you had tried to smear and admitted she was not gay. Now that Watts has come out as anti-gay rights you two are best buds. Is Watts getting political advice from you?

At 10:29 AM, nuts101 said...

It was all in you head guys.This
blog was never on fire. It has never been a forum for everyone to state their opinion but I guess that the way some people like it . Reminds me of when I go to rallies
for candidates. The only people that are there are the candidates and their families(sometimes). They talk and talk to each other. Then they wonder why more people did not go out to vote.But anyway my question? Why does David Van Os
hate Watts so much.Apart from the fact that he gave money to Abbott. If it's not about the money
he should not care because the money did not really affect the people vote.I still voted for Van Os. The people who were going to voted for Abbott were always going to vote for Abbott.

At 12:24 PM, YaGottaLoveIt said...

nuts101,

Van Os was our Democratic candidate for Attorney General in 2006. I don't blame him for being upset that Watts donated at least $15,000 to his Republican opponent, Greg Abbott. Now Watts supporters are saying Democrats should support Watts if he is the Democratic candidate no matter how they feel about him or his positions. It's hypocritical.

At 2:23 PM, nuts101 said...

I don't blame him for being upset.buuuutttt My point is is he blaming him for losing the election? He should'nt. He needs to get over that.And Noriega supporters are saying Noriega is the best even if he acceptrd money
from perry the swiftboat guy. Why is that not hypocritical. But is just proves my point. When you are supporting someone and think they walk on water as the bloggers do Noriega or Watts like his supporters support him You turn voters off.And then all these candidates have functions and no one goes to them and all these bloggers the South texas Chisme guys start getting personal with each other and a lot of people say what a bunch of creeps,ninnies,etc
The words were never complimentary.
But the worse one was culeros because they attacked people and hid behind the blog.

At 2:35 PM, YaGottaLoveIt said...

Van Os is not blaming Watts for losing the election, just for being two-faced. His positions on the issues were determined by pollsters and consultants, and Watts has never had to take a stand (politically) for his beliefs. Do you really know who Mikal Watts is? Why do you support such a blank slate for the important office of U.S. Senator?

At 4:34 PM, nuts101 said...

No I really don't know Who Mikal Watts is but that is my whole deal
breaking concept,Since I don't know
who you are I would not believe anything you say.And why you say it. Now him he is running for office.If I feel he's lying and a traitor and a Repub.I can tell him to his face.If you know the spanish language you what the word CULERO really means.What do you mean by a blank slate. That he doesn't have a thought of his own?
That the political consultants and strategists are the one's who determine what is daid. Not very smart of him then.

At 5:41 PM, YaGottaLoveIt said...

nuts101,

Why are you here? Certainly there is a pro-Watts blog somewhere where you can discuss your support for Watts with like-minded people. Perhaps you could start one -- and use your real name.

At 5:59 PM, YaGottaLoveIt said...

nuts101,

I've left your comments with your gutter language here so people can see what kind of people support Mikal Watts. Does your mother know you use such language?

At 10:30 PM, GulfCoastLeftie said...

Nuts101,

I'm confused. On this post, you say, "No I really don't know Who Mikal Watts is . . ." However, on an earlier STXC post (Mikal Watts raises money) you said, "I have known Mikal Watts before he had his millions.He was a true democrat then just as he is now."

Which is it? Do you know Mr. Watts or not?

You say, "Since I don't know
who you are I would not believe anything you say.And why you say it." Yet you post comments without revealing your identity.

Nuts101, I do not believe anything you say--not because you refuse to post with your true identity, but because you contradict yourself.

At 10:59 PM, nuts101 said...

Get over yourself guys, really.

At 11:02 PM, nuts101 said...

and thats my point. You are not using your real names.and if i don't support who you want me to support I can't post comment? This is the reality of this blog.

At 1:55 AM, Jaime Kenedeño said...

Jaime,

You've had plenty of stuff posted here. The only time you got censored is when you insisted on publishing lying homophobic smears, one about a candidate Watts was supporting for reelection. You later met one of the people you had tried to smear and admitted she was not gay. Now that Watts has come out as anti-gay rights you two are best buds. Is Watts getting political advice from you?

I smell bullsh/t

At 1:56 AM, Jaime Kenedeño said...

David Van Os is not even his name.

Do the homework

At 2:16 AM, Jaime Kenedeño said...

WATT do you guys say to Juan Garcia when he endorses Mikal.

He will endorse Watts; right Juan?

Watts is not my favorite guy but he is much better than Cornyn and after the lashing he has deservedly endured, he has answered his critics.

Enough of the infighting about who the Democratic candidate will be, lets look at Cornyn and let the candidates launch at Junior John.

Lets go to the issues of the Junior incumbent carpet bagger.

Things will change if a Dem wins this race.

And the things you assert about me ya gotta luv it. You are a liar and I will tell you that to your face any day of the week and twice on Sunday.

Back up your assertions.

Jaime Kenedeño said...

dannoynted1 said...

First ya'll say your democratic....then you go underground.

VANOS is populist not democrat.

DINO isn't that watt you coined the "term"?

7:33 AM
CouldBeTrue said...

Nuts,

Ask Jaime how to set up your own blog. Jaime has a million of them. When you do, please come back and let us know where it is.

Don't forget to include your bio.

8:41 AM
dannoynted1 said...

Could you....like be truth full?

maybe you should ask Jaime he knows the difference between Watt is or couldbtrue

8:56 AM
Jaime Kenedeño said...

a million And counting.

They are like a creative filing cabinet for us.

Everything we write in here or over there is backed up in our data bank.

So it is futile to delete but then again you can always go back to the comment modification and let on the board certain favorable comments. That is censorship. That is a trust and bond you guys broke. It is a privilege for stxc when we write here.

9:02 AM

nuts101 said...

Thanks for the entertainment.Now can you get more people to post so it can be a real debate?

nuts101 said...

Oh yes, Couldbetrue(is B.S.)Setting a blog up is easy .I dont need Jaime or anyone to do that.Let me give you some advise. Dont use the blogs to rant and rave and expose your personal hate toward certain people. That when blogs fail as your's has done.Write letters to your self and read them.

nuts101 said...

Noriega voted to "prevent the state providing healthcare for the children of illegal immigrants". Cannot vote for him now. will not.never

Unknown said...

David Van Os
Sat Jul-14-07 12:28 AM


Reading this discussion thread

was inspiring. What uplifting, awesome, tough Texas women you all are. Seeing your fire for liberty flaming is truly a joy.

Women of the world, arise! You have nothing to lose but your chains.

--- A brother.
David Van Os, Democratic Candidate for Texas Attorney General 2006


There will always be a choice; it might cost more,.... then again, I wished bullets would cost more.

And a gallon of gas cost at least a dollar less.

Watts voting on the "Choice Issue" or Cornyn voting against it?

It is YOUR "CHOICE ISSUE" and who is more pro choice Mikal or Cornyn?

We all know the true answer regardless of any conceived PRO CHOICE rhetoric or PRO CHOICE Posture.

That makes Cornyn and his camp become the target.

If your choice is to continue and rock the boat you can take your progressive policy making to the progressive party or the SPTX. We'z in South Texas have come to realize a dem on dem (and in this case extreme left wing) is futile and counter productive. So if you guys want to bicker over and make a decision to support a candidate on two issues without regard to any of the other things like victory,...
or replacing the "carpet bagger" with a fresh Senator

A Senator who is definitely more progressive than Junior John in D.C.

We have better things to do than argue with unreasonable closed minds.

Let us make a CHOICE to engage the passionate fire for liberty against a man who has already made the CHOICE to vote against your right of CHOICE as a Woman.

Junior John has already voted against Gay Marriage and he voted inline with the racist immigration build a wall lobby.

Junior John has already demonstrated how he will vote on the issues why are we not hammerin him?

To hypothesize is not a feasable CHOICE when we have (in evidence) a proven track record of voting against the CHOICE ISSUES some of you guys hold so dear to your heart.

SNAP guys~! or go make your own party from scratch but dont come into our party as a DINO while in truth you only come to the Dem Party out of expediency while deceiving and exploiting.

Let us take the divide and conquer to the Junior John "Carpet Baggers". Who can we get to challenge Cornyn as a Republican. How bout one of you guys taking one for the team?

We need to draft a cadidate to run against Junior John.

No more primary civil wars we have a common adversary.

nuts101 said...

Thank you. Can you post on South texas Chisme because I am Tired Of being the only one who ever posts.
Help Me! Help Me!( from The Fly-the original Movie Not the new one)
The Jester of Online Strategy.

No offence intended for Eddie Rodriguez, Watts new Director of Online Strategy.

nuts101 said...

I was reading old blogs.You were a person filled with hatred. For Watts,Nonola,Precinct Chairs,Mike Chavez. The list is endless.What happened.

nuts101 said...

OH so much hatred and fear on South Texas Chisme. So much anger.
So much hypocracy,So much Loneliness.I will pray to the Virgen de Guadalupe.

Jaime Kenedeño said...

I was reading old blogs.You were a person filled with hatred. For Watts,Noyola,Precinct Chairs,Mike Chavez. The list is endless.What happened.

It was not hatred of the people it was hatred of cheating. They were not playing fair.

With Watts, he came out and addressed the things we had said he was doing. He said yes, I am pooling my money with some other guys and we are putting it behind certain candidates. We all want good judicial representation he said. And these guys are not doing favors for anybody nor watts. I can respect the man for standing up and defending his position. He answers the phone when you call and he talks to you. He was one of the first guys to respond when my father passed away. He could have been a mean asshole to me at that time which I would have responded definitely, but he was very honorable about it. Also I worked with Jimmy at the end when he had got very far behind Kaelin.men

Jaime Kenedeño said...

I work at night usually and will be addressing everything written this evening. I am also doing major research on the Cornyn clan.But that's cool we can work together towards somme common goals.

Jaime Kenedeño said...

nuts101 said...

and yes it couldbe true and no I don't gottaloveit.Come on see if we can reach 40 comments.Get some more people to comment.There was an interesting diary on bor about Richardson using the word Maricon.
Can we discuss that in reference
to my using the word you called gutter language which to me only means coward of the worse kind. You obviously know or use some other connatation.

12:32 PM
Comment deleted

This post has been removed by the blog administrator.

3:05 PM
Comment deleted

This post has been removed by the blog administrator.

3:14 PM
nuts101 said...

But you know me so I didn't have a teacher that taught me that. I learned it meant a coward of the
worse sort that hids behind what ever they can. Like you.

3:41 PM
nuts101 said...

Hey don't delete posts.I already hit the save button. Please please put them Back.

3:44 PM
nuts101 said...

There was no bad language use by Yagottaloveit when that person used a personal name. You really should put that post back.

4:48 PM
Jaime Kenedeño said...

This place dont respect any view obtuse to theirs and if it reveals them the same thing.

That is whyI copy everything I leave here. This is WATT sends them rolling down hill. That damn censor button is discrediting.

5:14 PM
Delete
nuts101 said...

Why is yougottaloveit so mean and hateful. But they should have left his or her comment posted. They used a personal name. It's ok if people know who anybody is. Maybe it would be better,cleaner that way.

5:39 PM
Jaime Kenedeño said...

You know, to me it doesnt really matter one's true identity it is WATT one says (or writes in our case). When the identity thing becomes a problem is when one knows who a screen name is and he remains anonymous. Now sometime we need anonymity when we are operating in a dangerous capacity. When it is used to hide behind a firewall and unjustly attack is a coward. I will tell you to your face WATT is written here or there. My Papa taught me to be that kind of man. I got a firm handshake and I will look you in the eye.

I am officially in Cornyn Mode!

Cornyn has a track record telling us everything we need to know about him. If we are going to beat him; we need to dissect him (like is done to your own Dems)

Jaime Kenedeño said...

I will put her up against you in a spelling bee


if you got the balls. We can broadcast it on the web.

Or would you rather back the smack up in a contest of Jeopardy?

If only, we were in the days of Burr and Hickory.

WATT is that word you like to be called in spanish?

It means coward?

In plain English, WATT do you cower from.

You think we dont know who the Chismosos are?

Merry Christmas

Walk the Walk

Oh yeah remember when all the team members names disappeared?

WATT happened?

If you want to make this personal, I will oblige.
Original Message
I think I deciphered a little more of dannoynted1's post.
Posted by YaGottaLoveIt


When dannoynted1 said:
And the answer to your question, "watts anti-woman?"
The term is: misogynist

dannoynted1 and Jaime/Anton often use "watts" when they mean "what's". I always thought they were making a play on Mikal Watts name, but apparently they just don't know how to spell "what's". So, Mrs. Haley was just answering your question "What's anti-woman?"

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=180&topic_id=44751&mesg_id=44825

7:50 PM

Jaime Kenedeño said...

Junior John has not one iota of commitment to the Education of our youth. If he does I havent seen it. Only yeahs for big money and ney for everyone else except the immigration demographic he panders to as he voted no to immigration reform as proposed. Correct me if I am wrong but he supported criminalizing 12 million or so who are already in the states. Can you imagine if we lost that raw labor?

He supports the building of a wall which will only make the gate keepers rich.

Jaime Kenedeño said...

23. I would normally say welcome to DU dannoynted1

But seeing that you have disabled your profile, i.e. hiding like a coward, combined with your support of republicans on a Democratic board makes you stick out like the troll you probably are. Go back to freeperville dannoynted1!



Sonia

36. How is it.......

you call my Lioness names from behind a keyboard and of all things; because her profile is disabled?



We are here with our real identities acknowledged, our good name precedes us. Support of republicans? Maybe you mistake us for our elected Democrats who support the Delay Brothers and are frequently absent when it is time to vote on bartered legislation trade outs. Now back to the ad hominem attack, your reasoning is fallacial as it implies we are hiding our identities as if we have something to fear. Ridicule and attempts to discredit are only last resort attempts of futility. Sonia, you are wrong and you should apologize.
"For the Lord will not forsake his people; he will not abandon his heritage; for justice will return to the righteous, and all the upright in heart will follow it."